News

ONE CHAMPION FOR EVERY WEIGHT DIVISION

What if boxing had one champion for every weight division?

theguardian.com

A group of writers frustrated with the current system of ranking boxers, which has 17 weight divisions and 35 champions, created a method to judge the best fighter at every weight.

Floyd Mayweather shows off another belt. Photograph: Gene Blevins/LA DailyNews/Corbis

Anyone at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas on September 14 would have noticed an Elvis-worthy display case featuring Mayweather's robes, gloves and boots from past bouts. Several acronym-emblazoned "championship" belts were also featured. In a moment of clarity, the best pound-for-pound fighter on the planet waved them off – "I think we should have one belt and that's it."

"It's so crazy how I beat Miguel Cotto for the WBA Junior middleweight championship, right?" Mayweather said. "So how did Austin Trout beat Cotto for the WBA Championship and how is Canelo the WBA Champ?"

The WBA is the same cockeyed governing body that stripped Muhammad Ali when he gave Sonny Liston a rematch in 1965, prompting a laugh from sports writer Jimmy Cannon: "One word from them and the fight mob does as it pleases."

In 1970, they ranked Joe Frazier No7 after he refused to participate in a tournament they were sponsoring. He was at his peak. In the 1980s bribes and pay-offs for higher rankings came to light. Today, despite the fact that there are only 17 weight divisions, they identify 35 champions with an assortment of belts and vivid imaginations.

The WBA is one among many sanctioning bodies flourishing in an unregulated era where anyone and everything is up for grabs. Their trick titles are unwittingly propped up by fighters and puffed up by network executives operating under misguided assumptions about what fans really want.

What do fans really want? It begins with the truth.

Strict reasoning and common sense
The Transnational Boxing Rankings Board was formed one year ago on behalf of every fan, fighter, writer and media figure fed up with 50 years of confusion and corruption. Our mandate springs from the best efforts of the past to "provide boxing with authoritative top-10 rankings, identify the singular world champion of every division based on strict reasoning and common sense, and to insist on the sport's reform."

What began with 25 boxing writers and record keepers representing 12 countries between the Americas and Australia has since increased to 35 representing 15 countries, now including Japan, New Zealand and the Philippines.

What began as monthly rankings was soon switched to weekly rankings published online every Tuesday. Boxing historians in the membership pointed out that the tradition of official monthly rankings stretches back to 1928 and is worth preserving, so these now appear in archive form.

We have also added a pound-for-pound list and a successions section presenting an abbreviated history behind each divisional throne. A Spanish-language version of the charter recently appeared on the website and there are plans to establish multi-lingual versions of the site.

The importance of allies
The success of this initiative is dependent on the support of fans and media buzz. Over the past year, we have much to be grateful for. Barely two weeks after our inaugural rankings were published, the initiative was mentioned on the Wall Street Journal website; founding member Tim Starks was interviewed by The Classical; and the rankings earned a place on Boxing.com and were adopted exclusively by The Sweet Science.com and East Side Boxing. A number of other websites have also adopted the rankings, including Mexico's Esquina Boxeo and Italy's BoxeRingweb, and they have been featured in the New Yorker, the Guardian and NPR.

Early in 2013, ESPN commentator Teddy Atlas contacted me to learn more about what we are trying to do for boxing. He decided to support the effort and on the March 29 edition of Friday Night Fights, he did so. The segment began with an on-air question posed to Atlas: Is something like this good for the sport? "It's not good. It's great." Atlas replied. "It might save the sport."

In August, Friday Night Fights included a featherweight bout between Jesus Cuellar and Claudio Marrero. Neither fighter was ranked in the Transnational Boxing Rankings, though the WBA inexplicably had Marrero at No2 and Cuellar at four. Atlas shook his head at that. "It makes you wonder about some of these ratings," he said. "When are we going to get some real ratings committees? I think there's one out there." The Transnational Boxing Rankings, he said, is "a group of national and international writers that have no biases. They have no agendas. They call it the way it is and they rate it the way it is."

The Robbery Clause
"We wuz robbed!" Manager Joe Jacobs shouted into a radio man's microphone minutes after Max Schmeling lost a decision to Jack Sharkey for the heavyweight championship of the world. Since that night in 1932, the term "robbery" has been used as a descriptive whenever the wrong man is declared the winner.

Eighty years to the month later, we introduced the robbery clause into our charter to address a major problem in boxing. If more than 75% of the board believes that the judges' decision in a non-championship fight is egregious enough to constitute a robbery, we reserve the right to rank the official loser over the official winner, effectively overturning the decision.

The divisional thrones
Upwards of 90% of those routinely announced as champions are actually contenders. This is a focal point of a charter that rejects shortcuts and appointments to the top of the division. We look toward the path of combat to fill each divisional throne. If vacant, only the two top ranked contenders can fight for it. This iron rule, controversial to some, is all that makes sense in boxing. And it is working better than we anticipated.

When we began one year ago, we recognised four successions that began the moment a victor was declared in a bout between the rightful top two Ring-ranked contenders. Since then, Wladimir Klitschko has finally and convincingly assumed the heavyweight throne. Three more thrones have also been seized under our auspices as the new authority for a total of eight.

The seventh was seized in September when Mayweather defeated Canelo Alvarez, his next-best rival in the junior middleweight division. The bout was announced as a defense of his WBA "Super Title" which isn't worth a fraction of the $1,245,000 sanctioning fee. The truth is far more significant than seven figures or silly belts. The truth is, Mayweather has the last laugh; someone should tell him he's a king.

His throne, recognised by a new rankings board with an old mandate, is not for sale. Four of us were there bearing witness – and keeping our hands in our own pockets.

The rankings

Top 10 pound-for-pound boxers (as of October 8)

1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Andre Ward
3. Juan Manuel Márquez
4. Sergio Martínez
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Carl Froch
7. Wladimir Klitschko
8. Guillermo Rigondeaux
9. Nonito Donaire
10. Danny Garcia

The champions

Heavyweight: Wladimir Klitschko
Light Heavyweight: Adonis Stevenson
Super Middleweight: Andre Ward
Middleweight: Sergio Martínez
Junior Middleweight: Floyd Mayweather
Junior Welterweight: Danny Garcia
Junior Featherweight: Guillermo Rigondeaux
Flyweight: Akira Yaegashi

NB: Cruiserweight, welterweight, lightweight, junior lightweight, featherweight, bantamweight, junior bantamweight, junior flyweight and strawweight are currently vacant..

• This is an article from our Guardian Sport Network

• This article first appeared on The Queensberry Rules

• Follow The Queensberry Rules on Twitter

Source: www.theguardian.com/sport/queensberry-rules-boxing-blog/2013/oct/15/boxing-one-champion-every-weight